A Historical Reflection - Leadership in Primitive Africa
It would not be right to imagine that the sort of administration in present day Africa makes little difference to the past. This applies to both political and religious sort of administration and comprehensive of different levels of initiatives. Despite the sort of authority (political or religious) or the level of initiative, e.g., head of state or leader of a family, there are signs that customary idea of administration in Africa is as yet pervasive in present day idea of administration. In this article the objective is to recognize the authority idea in Africa amid the primitive years of the advancement of the landmass. In the process it will likewise be indicated how the general population built up this idea. As a contextual investigation, uncommon consideration will be given to Sierra Leone in view of her uniqueness in being an African nation established by Western forces.
INDIGENOUS CONCEPT OF LEADERSHIP IN AFRICA
In his discourse on early human advancement, F. K. Buah in his book, 'Old World', mentioned this objective fact; "Before long men saw that it was not sheltered to have their homes scattered about and started to construct them close to each other in a similar place. This is the manner by which town life started. Where there are more than two families remaining in the territory, there must be somebody who will care for the benefit of all of the general population. The headman is by and large the principal individual who had settled in the town, or he was the most courageous of the general population who lived there. He was to administer these individuals by a board comprised of the most established and savvies men in the town." From these expressions of F. K. Buah, a foundation to the advancement of authority is brought into core interest. It can be watched that while Western nations have formed incredibly into cosmopolitan urban communities, a considerably bigger piece of Africa depicted early and ordinary town settings. Two things can be called attention to from the reference above concerning the way pioneers were perceived previously: in the first place, they were perceived regarding age or the day and age one has been in a specific region; second, they were perceived in light of some individual qualities or accomplishments.
In his book, 'The History of Sierra Leone' Magbaily Fyle talked about additional about this early types of administration in the mainland. As indicated by him, towns and towns may bunch together in a segment, which is alluded to as a state. The greater part of the towns may have their own prompt rulers. The leader of the primary town in that area, more often than not the most seasoned town, was the Chief of that segment. This head would be perceived as the King, since he had a place with the family, which established the town that turned into the focal point of the state.
Magbaily Fyle brought up that in the establishing of most states, fighting had been included. He said that if a man is an extraordinary seeker or warrior or even as in Mende nation, being a mainstream "moriman", it is simple for that individual to be brought the administration of an unmistakable town and in the end turning into the King of a state. Like F. K. Buah, Magbaily Fyle concurred that uncommon great qualities were basics for the acknowledgment of pioneers.
INDIGENOUS CONCEPT OF LEADERSHIP IN AFRICA
In his discourse on early human advancement, F. K. Buah in his book, 'Old World', mentioned this objective fact; "Before long men saw that it was not sheltered to have their homes scattered about and started to construct them close to each other in a similar place. This is the manner by which town life started. Where there are more than two families remaining in the territory, there must be somebody who will care for the benefit of all of the general population. The headman is by and large the principal individual who had settled in the town, or he was the most courageous of the general population who lived there. He was to administer these individuals by a board comprised of the most established and savvies men in the town." From these expressions of F. K. Buah, a foundation to the advancement of authority is brought into core interest. It can be watched that while Western nations have formed incredibly into cosmopolitan urban communities, a considerably bigger piece of Africa depicted early and ordinary town settings. Two things can be called attention to from the reference above concerning the way pioneers were perceived previously: in the first place, they were perceived regarding age or the day and age one has been in a specific region; second, they were perceived in light of some individual qualities or accomplishments.
In his book, 'The History of Sierra Leone' Magbaily Fyle talked about additional about this early types of administration in the mainland. As indicated by him, towns and towns may bunch together in a segment, which is alluded to as a state. The greater part of the towns may have their own prompt rulers. The leader of the primary town in that area, more often than not the most seasoned town, was the Chief of that segment. This head would be perceived as the King, since he had a place with the family, which established the town that turned into the focal point of the state.
Magbaily Fyle brought up that in the establishing of most states, fighting had been included. He said that if a man is an extraordinary seeker or warrior or even as in Mende nation, being a mainstream "moriman", it is simple for that individual to be brought the administration of an unmistakable town and in the end turning into the King of a state. Like F. K. Buah, Magbaily Fyle concurred that uncommon great qualities were basics for the acknowledgment of pioneers.
Comments
Post a Comment